China and India Not So Different After All

Whether the economic tumult in China in recent weeks represents an overdue market correction or a more significant inflection point is a matter of debate.  But one clear message is just how profoundly wrong is the long-running argument that China enjoys a decisive “autocratic advantage” while India is excessively burdened by a “democratic disadvantage.”

The most basic lesson of the Chinese and Indian cases does not turn on the differences between political systems.  Rather, it is about the common difficulty of enacting systemic reforms in large, complex countries outside the crucible of intense crisis.

Indeed, the danger now in Delhi is that the current growth pickup will permit official hubris to crowd out good policy intentions.  One detects more than a whiff of overconfidence when Jayant Sinha, the minister of state for finance, declares that “It is India’s moment” or boasts about India being on the verge of leaving “China behind as far as growth and development matter.”  These statements are not only at odds with the more somber sentiments of the Indian business community, but are all too redolent of the easy talk about the coming “Indian Century” that the Singh era specialized in.

Read the full essay at Asia Sentinel’s website.

I invite you to connect with me via Facebook and Twitter.

Pakistan’s Evolving Nuclear Weapon Posture: Impact on Deterrence Stability

This essay provides an overview of the ongoing quantitative and qualitative changes in Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and their impact on deterrence stability vis-à-vis India. Prominent among these trends is a major expansion in fissile material production that enables the manufacture of lighter and more compact warheads optimized for battlefield missions; the development of cruise missiles and shorter-range ballistic missiles possessing dual-use capabilities; and a greater emphasis in doctrinal pronouncements on the need for strike options geared to all levels of conflict. Although these trends pose problematic ramifications for the risks of unauthorized and inadvertent escalation, deterrence stability in South Asia is not as precarious as many observers fear. The challenges of fashioning a robust nuclear peace between India and Pakistan cannot be lightly dismissed, however, and policy makers would do well to undertake some reinforcing measures.

Read the full essay in a special issue on “Nuclear Stability in South Asia” published this week in The Nonproliferation Review.

I invite you to connect with me via Facebook and Twitter.

Foreign Companies Catch Sight of “The Tomorrow Ahead” in India

Make in IndiaThis analysis is cross-posted on the website of Geoskope, a business intelligence firm focused on key emerging markets, at which I serve as chief knowledge officer.

The previous issue of Datapoints explored just how difficult the politics of economic reform are in India.  This point underscores one of Geoskope’s core messages about the country: The business climate is challenging to say the least.  It’s no surprise, for example, that a just-released survey by the World Economic Forum ranks India as one of the worst places in the world for small business owners.

Ditto for the judgment expressed last month by Gurcharan Das, a former CEO of Procter & Gamble India, that “India remains a hostile place to do business.”  Or that the World Bank’s country director for India stated just today that “the stark reality is that India remains a difficult place to do business.”

But it’s also worth noting that a number of high-profile foreign businesses in recent weeks have expressed confidence about India’s long-term opportunities.  Their example highlights another of Geoskope’s basic messages: Companies in search of future sources of growth cannot afford to overlook India.  As the global CEO of Roche, the giant Swiss pharmaceutical company, put it a few days ago: “We always keep India on our radar.  The country is so big that you cannot ignore it.”

*********

Leading the parade is Amazon, which is determined not to repeat its experience in China, where the online retailer failed to move fast enough and has now been crowded out by home-grown companies like Alibaba.  India, which has a booming e-commerce sector, is Amazon’s second biggest investment country after its U.S. home market, and Diego Piacentini, the company’s global consumer business chief, calls India key to its future success.  He states:

We need to look at the long term. The kind of massive infrastructure and partnerships we are building in this country is huge. The US and Europe after some point will have a different growth trajectory.

Jeffrey Immelt’s, GE’s chairman & CEO, seconds the thought, stating that “India is a growth engine for Asia, and we see huge potential for the country in the manufacturing space.”  GE has doubled its investment in the country over the past five years and is looking to do even more.

Virginia Rometty, IBM’s CEO, declares that “the 21st century will be the Indian century and will have technology at its heart.  I’m very optimistic about the tomorrow ahead and this is a fact-based optimism.”

CNBC quotes emerging markets guru Mark Mobius as saying “GDP will go higher in coming months; India will probably achieve what China did 5-8 years ago.”

And the head of the Indian unit of LG, the South Korean electronics giant, believes “there is huge potential that India can take business away from China and export products to other countries.”

*********

Confidence in the long-term future is reflected in surging levels of foreign direct investment.  Nomura, the Japanese brokerage, estimates that India will receive nearly $35 billion in FDI flows in the current fiscal year (April 2015- March 2016), a more than 60-percent jump from the previous year.  Much of the FDI funds have gone into the ecommerce and manufacturing sectors.

According to the global consulting firm Bain & Company, private equity investors channeled $9.5 billion into the ecommerce sector in the first half of this year.  Bain’s India chief states the inflow is “primarily because investors believe that India will get back on the growth cycle again and it represents an attractive destination compared to other large emerging markets.”

Amazon is reportedly pouring in an additional $5 billion to broaden its presence in India, after pledging an initial $2 billion just a year ago.  And the company last week announced that it has opened seven new fulfillment centers to help the sellers on its online platform in India stock products that are shipped to customers through the company.  With the addition of these new facilities, Amazon now operates 20 such centers spread across 10 states in India.

Baidu, the web services company that dominates the internet in China, is also making a concerted effort to raise its profile in India.  The company, which is often called the “Google of China,” says the number of its users in India is one of the highest outside of its home market.  One of its executives notes that “India is important to us, given its 1.25 billion people, 19-percent internet penetration, and government policies that are favorable to promoting internet penetration.”

The Business Standard newspaper reports that the ecommerce boom has just put four young-ish entrepreneurs into India’s billionaire club.  And a leading business association last month released a study projecting that the start-up sector, including online ventures, will likely produce at least a dozen billionaires and score of millionaires by 2020.

*********

The tech manufacturing sector is also receiving lots of foreign attention, with many companies taking advantage of the investment incentives offered by the “Make in India” initiative that New Delhi has set up with the aim of making India a global manufacturing hub.

Leading the way on this front is Foxconn.  The Taiwanese company, which is the world’s largest electronics manufacturing service provider, made its name assembling Apple gear in China.  It now has big plans for India, where it says it intends to set up 10-12 plants and employ a million workers by 2020.

Terry Gou, the company’s founder, stated in a recent interview that “India is so big.  Maybe in 10 years, we can have a factory in every” of the country’s 29 states.  He added that “We are not in India only for assembling, but we want to be in the whole supply chain, key components and technology transfer.”  Foxconn envisions the country as an export platform to Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

The company is one of the most aggressive foreign investors in India, pumping billions into the ecommerce and solar power sectors (see here and here).  Last month it announced a $5 billion investment to set up a semiconductor manufacturing facility in western India that would employ some 50,000 workers.

Xiaomi, the giant Chinese phone maker that is sometimes called the “Apple of China, signaled last month that it would launch, in partnership with Foxconn, a new smartphone plant to in southern India.  India is the world’s fastest-growing smartphone market and has rapidly become Xiaomi’s largest market outside of China.  Xiaomi’s India head, a former Google executive, says that India “will someday be as big as China.  We are coming into India with full force.”

Lenovo, a prominent Chinese tech company, announced plans to establish an assembly facility in eastern India that will produce up to six million smartphones a year and employ 1,500 workers.

Even Phicomm, a minor Chinese smartphone maker, is getting into the act, with plans to invest $1 billion over the next few years.  A senior executive explains that outside of China, “India is our second largest potential market and that’s the whole reason why we have decided to come with a full-fledged plan.”

And Sony, after a decade of relying on imports, has begun local manufacturing of Bravia televisions.  The company ended local manufacturing in 2004 when it concluded that the existing size of the Indian marketplace did not justify a production facility.

*********

Big things are happening in the auto manufacturing sector, too.  With its growing consumer class, India is expected to become the world’s third-largest car market by 2020.  Companies are also increasingly attracted to the country’s low-cost but skilled manufacturing workforce.

General Motors has signaled its plans to invest $1 billion over the next few years to turn India into a global export hub.  The company’s international operations chief says, “With this investment we plan to tap India’s potential as a market and as a low-cost manufacturing base for the future.”

U.S. auto company Ford is making India an export platform and plans to export over 200,000 cars by 2020 to countries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere in Asia.

The Swedish company Volvo announced plans to begin exporting buses to Europe by the end of 2015.

The Economic Times, an Indian business newspaper, reports that Mexico, which is itself an emerging global hub for auto manufacturing, has become the largest export market for the Indian auto industry.  Volkswagen, Europe’s largest carmakers, ships some 55,000 vehicles a year from India to Mexico, while General Motors sends some 45,000 units.

According to the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, auto exports have doubled from 1.8 million units in 2009-10 to 3.57 million in 2014-15.

European car makers Mercedes Benz, BMW and Audi also have sharply ramped their sourcing of Indian-made component parts.  Per the Automotive Component Manufacturers’ Association of India, component exports have grown from $4.2 billion in 2009-10 to $11.2 billion in 2014-15.

*********

In related manufacturing news, Boeing announced earlier this month plans to markedly increase its sourcing of India-made products.

And Siemens, the German industrial conglomerate, unveiled plans to invest an additional one billion euros in India over the next few years and add some 4,000 jobs to its existing Indian workforce of 16,000.

I invite you to connect with me via Facebook and Twitter.

Hamid Gul and Pakistan’s Schizophrenia

The recent passing of Hamid Gul, the Pakistani general who served as head of the powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency in the late 1980s, elicited a good deal of media commentary about the instrumental role he played on several fronts: the collapse of the Soviet Union; the jihadization of Afghanistan and Pakistan; and the destabilization of the Punjab and Kashmir regions in India.

But Gul also exemplified the oscillations within the Pakistani military establishment between anti-India paranoia and the desire to stabilize relations with Delhi.

The example of Hamid Gul and his successors illustrates what is a basic frustration for Indian leaders: Any rapprochement with Pakistan can only come about via a military establishment that swings between paranoia and pragmatism.  The anti-India fixation receives much focus these days.  But officials in New Delhi would also do well not to lose sight of the desire to find equilibrium in relations.

Read the rest of the essay on Fair Observer‘s website.

I invite you to connect with me via Facebook and Twitter.